It's one thing to have certain political beliefs.
It's another thing to use these political beliefs as a means of diluting an unrelated justice cause with a very specific focus.
And, above all of that, it's a whole other thing altogether if you claim to be against people doing this while engaging in it yourself on a regular basis.
To be clear, because myopic people like George Martin are unable to fathom that someone criticizing his right-wing intersectionality does not automatically make them an "intersectional," this post is not promoting intersectionality of ANY political leaning. It is against all that tries to force anthropocentric nonsense onto this movement that is for other animals specifically and exclusively.
However, I wanted to address this particular strain of intersectionality because it seldom ever gets addressed. Most people have come to accept that embracing right-wing intersectionality is what it means to be "anti-intersectional." This is because all of these people arguing over this shit tend to not even care about animal emancipation in the first place.
We need to change this, so this is why I'm giving my input on this discourse.
"A further point to notice is that this principle, this doctrine, is concerned with one matter only. A big matter, it is true, but a clearly defined one: the matter of the right relationship between man and the animals."
- Leslie Cross (The Vegan Story, 1955)
Shoutout to @vic_valente for being one of the earlier people to comment on this hypocritical bullshit.
keywords: George Martin
